Micheal Jackson verdict

**pvfan** · June 14th, 2005, 01:21 PM

I agree the defense did a good enough job to win the case. I still find it wrong that as a country we let let 40 year old men to sleep with kids.

June 14th, 2005, 06:21 PM

What bothers me is gcdevil says we find him quilty. Yet says do i think MJ ever did molest a child and his answer is yes. But these two no?
So why is he still not guilty. If not these two than the one's he paid to settle out of court. Ok. So you basically say this man is a child molester, but not these two so he should be free? I at first said the same thing. But after all the testimony. And this charge number what? I can't see it all being about money.
You point to the children and their parents. Well what about a 40 yr old and his ways? His divorce papers were sealed? Yet this same man holds a child out a window? Yet has a place called neverland. A child's dream land, yet MJ is no way a freak of nature or a child molester? Ok.
He has the profile of a child molester. Prey is those who he knows he can use and manipulate. Who's family will be condemned or come across wrong in society. Crazy or money hungry. Or troublesome. You see Mcauley Caulkin he is really reliable? He testified MJ didn't touch him. But gets busted with prescription drugs, yet no prescription for them, and weed? Shot his credibility all to crap.
MJ is a freak, even his own family thinks so, if your looking for the Brady Bunch in that bunch, well sorry. And i think the real father in the Brady's was gay.
Only one i felt sorry for and still do is the mother of the Jackson's. The father is just another arrogant egotistical wantta be anything.
I don't think you have to look to far to find the whole problem with the Jackson family. Dad.

**PVVikeFan** · June 14th, 2005, 06:29 PM

He is a wierd, sick little "man" who should never be allowed around children again. And any parent who would allow a child around him should have their children taken away and put into a GOOD home.

**gcdevil22** · June 14th, 2005, 09:10 PM

you're not really capturing what i believe...im talking about this case and this case alone, he was proven innocent (yes, thats right, the FACTS were in his favor) and yet you all are creaming for the chair for the guy

from looking at his other cases (the ones decided outside of court) it seems as though they had solid cases (hence my statement about he probably has molested someone, just not this kid)...it was the family of the otehr children's option to pursue this and put him in jail but they did not do so, THAT and that alone is why he was on the streets after those incidents....does that mean he will be guilty of every case brought before him??? no, absolutely not, and we should not assume that

dont get me wrong...im not a big michael jackson supporter nor am i a card holder of the NAACP, but it would be an injustice to presume someone is guilty especially if youre just basing your opinions on how he looks, or the way he acts...dude is screwed up no doubt, but it doesnt make him guilty of all crimes he's ever charged with

June 14th, 2005, 10:28 PM

All i will say is money and fame walks. If it was you and just an acqusation. Well how many yrs do you think you would get? Simple as that. The person who doesn't have the fame cannot get out of it. Or the money. That is the facts. If he did it before. Then he would do it again. And the kids before were just like these kids.
I just take the facts as i see them. The man needs some mental counseling. And in all honesty i think the whole Jackson family outside of momma Jackson needs some. If you look at the past 10 plus years. One really screwed up family. And you always hear mom held it together, while dad just yelled make me more.

**gcdevil22** · June 15th, 2005, 01:05 AM

if it were me and the exact same case with the exact same evidence with the exact same witnesses...i would walk too

but of course, there'd still be people who would think i did it anyway

**gcdevil22** · June 15th, 2005, 01:12 AM

where are all the people around here who are the big michael supporters??

yall talk about the jurors were "afraid" of the michael supporters...thats bull, theres more people against michael than for, so why wouldnt they be "afraid" of all the people who wanna see him go to jail??

let's be honest here, michael aint much of a celebrity anymore and all he gets is bad publicity, so it should say something to you about the facts of this case that they voted unanimously that he was not guilty...i mean if all you see in the news is about michael molesting little boys and jokes about him molesting boys, then itd kinda make it hard to vote not guilty wouldnt it???

haha but you mention "money" again...what does that have to do with ANYTHING...who did he pay in this case?? any halfway decent lawyer could expose these 2 individuals so its not like the lawyer did anything extraordinary...he definitely didnt pay the jury, so where does money fit into this equation??

**MikMo** · June 15th, 2005, 08:51 AM

Sorry devil, but you would be in the big house right about now. Only difference, like LPDFTBL said, is money. If you're able to afford the best lawyers money can buy, like Micheal Jackson or O.J., then you would walk just like the both of them did. But if you're only able to afford the type of lawyers that most of us on here are able to, then, I hate to tell you, the guilty verdict would be a foregone conclusion.

**gcdevil22** · June 16th, 2005, 02:02 AM

but thats not really a good point to argue b/c you cant really know for sure if the average man would be put in jail under the same circumstances...all the evidence points to no, however...they seriously had no case, and his fame is really all that dragged it out as long as it did